Coos County Residents to Vote on Public Health
Voters in Coos County will decide whether to adopt a tax levy to support public health services in its county, as reported today by the Eugene Register-Guard.
This could mean the difference between maintaining local authority for public health, or turning it over to the State. The local model would cost 9 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value for a total of $1.35 million over the three years from property owners. That would raise about $450,000 a year for the next three years. While this is not even enough to support current services, it will still allow the county to maintain a basic, decent level of services.
Currently, the county public health department oversees a wide variety of services including monitoring drinking water quality, restaurant inspections, immunizations, family planning, emergency preparedness, communicable disease tracking and nutrition programs. Timber revenues once covered many of these services, and although the U.S. Congress reinstated Timber revenues in last week’s Bailout Plan, none of that funding is likely to be directed to public health services.
The good news is that this money would aid in getting matching funds from Federal and other funding sources, and keep services of the community within the community. While passing this levey would mean that folks will have to dig deeper into their pockets during tough economic times, research shows that investing in public health has proven to save costly expenses down the road, and improve the health of the workforce and the entire community.
If you live in Coos County, let us know what you think.
4 comments




The measure failed, with 68% voting no and 31% voting yes. While this is not a referendum on funding public health as much as it is a rejection of taxes by a conservative community facing a serious recession, it does pose serious challenges to the public health community. The hardest of these will be to convince legislators in Coos and other rural counties that investing resources in public health is fiscally responsible because of the significant return on investing in community-based public health priorities.
Alejandro Queral
American Heart Association