rss Subscribe to the RSS feed.
What's RSS?

The Conversation

Abstinence-Only Education Proven Effective

It has been called the first-ever study demonstrating the effectiveness of abstinence-only sex education. A study published in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine of has found that found that abstinence-only sex education helped to delay a group of middle-school students’ sexual initiation

The participants’ mean age was 12.2 years; 53.5% were girls; and 84.4% were still enrolled at 24 months. The model-estimated probability of ever having sexual intercourse by the 24-month follow-up was 33.5% in the abstinence-only intervention and 48.5% in the control group.

“This is a rigorous study that means we can now say it’s possible for an abstinence-only intervention to be effective,” Dr. John B. Jemmott III, the University of Pennsylvania professor who led the study.

The research followed 662 African-American students at urban middle schools, paid $20 a session to attend the classes, plus follow-up and evaluation sessions. The abstinence-only classes covered HIV, abstinence and ways to resist the pressure to have sex.

The New York Times reports that the research “appears just as the Obama administration is eliminating federal financing for abstinence-only programs, and starting a pregnancy-prevention initiative that will finance programs that have been shown in scientific studies to be effective.”

The Times also reported that “even longtime advocates of comprehensive sex education heralded the findings,” quoting Sarah Brown of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy as saying “This new study is game-changing.”

The public health community has tended to ridicule abstinence-only education as ineffective, politically-motivated, and wishful-thinking by Christian conservatives.

Is this really a “game-changer”?

Will the public health community modify its conventional wisdom on this, or will it make every effort to find flaws in the study?



3 Comments:

Posted by Mariamarta Lee on February 21st, 2010 at 07:55 AM

Of course the kids stayed in the program and were compliant.
They were paid $20 bucks a session! I would have stayed, too.
I’d like to see the results of the study when you don’t pay the middleschooler to attend because those results would probably be closer to reality.

Posted by skepticalofabstinenceonly on February 19th, 2010 at 10:29 AM

the mean age was 12.2 years? it’s reasonable that younger folks will find success w/ abstinence only education. how does this abtinence only education translate to 16, 17, 18 or 19 year olds. not very well. let’s talk about the studies that prove that when you speak openly, honestly and accurately about sex, people report fewer lifetime partners, fewer non-consentual encounters and fewer instances of HIV/STD.

let’s stop acting as if sex is something that needs to be stopped and act on the fact that sex is something that needs to be learned about.

Posted by Du Lam on February 8th, 2010 at 05:39 PM

Abstinence-Only Education give us an illusion that our children are safe and they will only listen to their teachers. The truth is, our children’ minds are very similar to a sponge. A sponge does not discriminate the liquid it absorb. Abstinence-Only Education leave our children’ curiosity patch dry. It does nothing to empower the minds of children. Thus the dry sponge seek more knowledge on what school did not provide. They learn from false sources and mislead adults. Looking at the number of teen pregnancy in this country, one must be blind not to see that Abstinence-Only Education only gave the parents a peace of minds while provide the children nothing but the thirst to learn more. The thirst that is driven by our natural hormones, by the media, and by the covered truth. So strong that it soon shatter the false illusion Abstinence-Only Education has on this country’s education system.




Join the conversation. Leave a comment.

Name: (required)

Email: (required) will not be published

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Submit the word you see below:


Back to main